Vibe Coding Academy
    Back to Course
    Week 8
    Build Lab

    MVP Launch to Beta Users

    Ship your MVP to real users and learn from their behaviour

    Estimated time: 8-10 hours
    Semester 1/Phase 2 · Build Without Code/Week 8

    Lesson

    This week puts the MVP in front of real users. You will plan onboarding, observe behaviour, collect structured feedback, and decide what to fix first.

    What you will be able to do
    • Prepare a beta release checklist
    • Onboard ten relevant users
    • Combine behaviour data with direct feedback
    • Prioritise fixes using impact and effort

    Define the beta goal

    A beta is a learning period with a clear question. Decide what successful use looks like, which users qualify, what you will measure, and what support you can provide. Tell users the product is early and explain how to report problems.

    Measure the core journey

    Track a small number of events: arrival, account creation, first meaningful action, completion, and return. Analytics show what happened. Interviews and recordings help explain why. Avoid collecting more personal data than the test requires.

    Observe without rescuing

    During a usability session, give the user a realistic task and let them work. Ask them to think aloud. Do not teach the interface while testing it. Confusion is useful evidence.

    Prioritise evidence

    Group feedback into bugs, usability problems, missing value, and requests. Rank items by user impact, frequency, confidence, and effort. Fix broken core flows before adding attractive extras.

    Video of the week

    Why it fits: A recent explanation of finding early believers, learning from churn and letting early users shape the product.

    Video activity

    Recruit five suitable beta users personally and track what each person tries, completes and abandons.

    The video supports the lesson above — it doesn't replace it.

    Guided activities

    1. 1Write a beta invitation and onboarding message
    2. 2Define five events for the core journey
    3. 3Watch three users and record moments of hesitation
    Prompt you can adapt
    Organise this beta feedback into bugs, usability issues, missing value, and feature requests. Merge duplicates but preserve the original evidence. Score each item for impact, frequency, confidence, and effort. Recommend the next five actions and explain why each one matters to the core workflow.

    Week 8 · Case study

    Plinq improves its MVP with real beta feedback

    Source note: Documented founder story published by Lovable. User growth and timing are reported figures; the safety warning is course guidance. The student-sized version below is an illustrative exercise, not part of the reported case.

    In 2025, Brazilian growth marketer Sabrine Matos used Lovable to create Plinq, a women’s safety platform providing access to public background information. The MVP was built in approximately 45 days.

    Instead of waiting for a perfect product, the team released an early version and refined it using feedback from beta users. Lovable reports that Plinq reached more than 10,000 users during its first three months.

    Because Plinq deals with safety and personal information, students should study its discovery and iteration process—not attempt to reproduce its sensitive data features without professional legal and security support.

    Student-sized version

    Recruit five to ten beta users for a low-risk product. Give them a realistic task, observe without coaching, and record where they stop, hesitate, or misunderstand the interface.

    Discussion question

    Which finding would justify changing the core workflow rather than adding another feature?

    Respond in your submission →

    Tools & Techniques

    Lovable
    PostHog
    Hotjar
    Loom

    Assignment

    Onboard ten beta users and submit a structured feedback report. Include the beta question, user criteria, onboarding flow, behaviour metrics, interview findings, prioritised fixes, and the changes you made.